Combating antisemitism: Recommendations for municipal leaders

Antisemitism often manifests locally through harassment at public meetings, threats, vandalism, and online intimidation. While not all antisemitic conduct is criminal, the Commission makes clear that failure to name and respond to antisemitism can normalize harm and leave those affected feeling isolated or dismissed. Local leadership matters most in moments of uncertainty. Clear public communication, specificity about the nature of the harm, and attention to the needs of those impacted all help reinforce community standards and maintain trust.

The Commission emphasizes that relationships built before an incident are more effective than those formed in crisis. Municipalities are well positioned to convene, coordinate, and sustain relationships with trusted community partners, including faith‑based and cultural organizations. These partnerships support early communication, shared expectations, and more effective response when incidents occur. They also help foster greater understanding, collaboration, allyship and community cohesion as well.

Promoting awareness of JAHM aligns with broader efforts to build inclusive workplaces, and communities, educate employees and community members about Jewish history and culture, and combat antisemitism through understanding and visibility. Recognizing Jewish American Heritage Month also publicly sends a message that combating antisemitism is not just a compliance issue, but also a matter of shared civic responsibility.

The Commission finds that antisemitic incidents and hate crimes are frequently underreported and, in some cases, misclassified due to lack of training. Training equips officers to recognize bias motivation, distinguish between incidents and crimes, and respond in ways that prioritize victim support and trust. Consistent reporting by municipal police departments is essential to understanding the scope of antisemitism statewide. State data systems rely on local participation. When reporting is inconsistent, patterns are missed and resources cannot be effectively targeted

Antisemitism often targets institutions as well as individuals. Houses of worship, community centers, and nonprofit facilities face heightened risk and often limited capacity to manage security concerns alone. While security resources are often administered at the state or federal level, municipalities play a critical role in coordination, preparedness, and local response. Clear points of contact, relationships with local police, and proactive planning all reduce risk.